Questões de Inglês - Grammar - Verbs - Simple past
Complete the sentence below with the correct verbs. Choose the CORRECT answer.
I ______ you in the park yesterday. You ______ on the grass and ______ a book.
Read the sentences below.
1. Andy reads comic books.
2. Sandy sings in the bathroom.
3. My sister helps in the kitchen.
The verbs in bold are in the:
Choose the correct options in order to complete the text below, while keeping the same meaning from the original text.
“Blood tests every year or two to check for lymphoma are recommended, especially for patients with severe disease.
“Blood ________ every year or two to ________ for lymphoma are _________, especially for patients with _________ disease.
Read the text to answer the question.
Back to School
For generations in the United States, a nineteenth century
invention known as the public school system was seen as
the best way to give students the knowledge and skills to
become nice citizens. Around the 1960s, experts began
[05] questioning the system, citing the need for new types of
schools to meet the changing demands of the twentieth
century. These reformers eventually won for parents a much
broader range of educational choices – including religious,
alternative, and charter schools and home schooling – but they
[10] also sparked a debate on teaching and learning that still
divides experts to this day.
Nunan, David - Listen in book 2, second edition.
The words “become” (line 4) and “meet” (line 6), in bold type in the text, are
Instruções: Leia atentamente o texto abaixo para responder à questão.
Lembrando e pensando a TV
Houve um tempo em que a TV − acreditem, ó jo-
vens! − ainda não existia. Ouvia-se rádio, ia-se ao cine-
ma. Mas um dia chegou às casas das pessoas um apa-
relho com o som vivo do rádio acoplado a vivas ima-
[5] gens, diferentes das do cinema, imagens chegadas de
algum lugar do presente, “ao vivo”. Logo saberíamos
que todas as imagens do mundo, inclusive os filmes do
cinema, poderiam estar ao nosso alcance, naquela
telinha da sala. Modificaram-se os hábitos das famílias,
[10] seus horários, sua disponibilidade, seus valores. A TV
chegou para reinar.
A variedade da programação já indicava o amplo
alcance do novo veículo: notícias, reportagens, musi-
cais, desenhos animados, filmes, propagandas, seria-
[15] dos, esportes, programas humorísticos, peças de teatro
− tudo desfilava ali, diante dos nossos olhos, ainda no
tubo comandado por grandes válvulas e com imagem
em preto e branco. Boa parte dos primeiros aparelhos
de TV tinham telas de 16 a 21 polegadas, acondicio-
[20] nadas numa enorme e pesada caixa de madeira. Havia
uns três ou quatro canais, com alcance bastante limitado
e programação restrita a cinco ou seis horas por dia.
Mais tarde as transmissões passariam a ser via satélite
e ocupariam as 24 horas do dia.
[´25] Os custos da programação eram pagos pela publi-
cidade, que tomava boa parte do tempo de transmissão.
Vendia-se de tudo, de automóveis a margarina, de xaro-
pes para tosse a apartamentos. Filmetes gravados e
propagandas ao vivo sucediam-se e misturavam-se a
[30] notícias sobre exploração espacial, enquanto docume-
ntários estrangeiros falavam da revolução russa, da
II Guerra, do nazismo e do fascismo, das convicções
pacifistas de Ghandi, das ideias do físico Einstein sobre
a criação e a legitimação da ONU etc. etc. Já as incur-
[35] sões históricas propiciadas pelos filmes nos levavam ao
tempo de Moisés e do Egito Antigo, ao Império Romano
e advento do Cristianismo, tudo entremeando-se ao
humor de Chaplin, às caretas de Jerry Lewis e às trapa-
lhadas das primeiras comédias nacionais do gênero
[40] chanchada. Houve também o tempo em que as famílias
se agrupariam diante dos festivais da canção, torcendo
por músicas de protesto, baladas românticas ou de
ritmos populares “de raiz”. Enfim, a TV oferecia a um pú-
blico extasiado um espetáculo variadíssimo, tudo nas
[45] poucas polegadas do aparelho, que não tardou a incor-
porar outras medidas, outros sistemas de funcioname-
nto, projeção em cores e controle remoto.
As telas de plasma, o processo digital e a interface
com a informática foram dotando a TV de muitos outros
[50] recursos, até que, bem mais tarde, tivesse que enfrentar
a concorrência de outras telas, muito menores, portáteis,
disponíveis nos celulares, carregados de aplicativos e
serviços. Apesar disso, nada indica que a curto prazo
desapareçam da casa os aparelhos de TV, enriquecidos
[55] agora por incontáveis dispositivos.
No plano da cultura e da educação, a televisão
teve e tem papel importante. Os telecursos propiciam
informação escolar específica nas áreas de Matemática,
Física, História, Química, Língua e Literatura, fazendo
[60] as vezes da educação formal por meio de incontáveis
dispositivos pedagógicos, inclusive a dramatização de
conteúdos. Aqui e ali há entrevistas com artistas, polí-
ticos, pensadores e personalidades várias, atualizando
ideias e promovendo seu debate. No campo da política,
[65] é relevante, às vezes decisivo, o papel que a TV tem na
formação da opinião pública. A ecologia conta, também,
com razoável cobertura, informando, por exemplo, sobre
os benefícios da reciclagem de lixo, da cultura de pro-
dutos orgânicos e da energia solar.
[70] Seja como forma de entretenimento, veículo de
informação, indução aos debates e repercussão atuali-
zada dos grandes temas de interesse social, a TV vem
garantindo seu espaço junto a bilhões de pessoas no
mundo todo. Por meio dela, acompanhamos ao vivo mo
[75] mentos agudos da política internacional, a divulgação
de um novo plano econômico do governo, a escalada da
violência urbana. Ao toque de uma tecla do controle re-
moto, você pode se transferir, aleatoriamente, do palco
de um ataque terrorista para o final meloso de uma co-
[80] média romântica.
Numa espécie de espelhamento multiplicativo e
fragmentário da nossa vida e dos poderes da nossa
imaginação, a TV vem acompanhando os passos da
vida moderna e ditando, mesmo, alguns deles, sem dar
[85] sinal de que deixará tão cedo de nos fazer companhia.
(Percival de Lima e Souto, inédito)
O trecho Ouvia-se rádio, ia-se ao cinema, no texto principal, pode ser traduzido para o inglês como
TEXT
Pope Francis disappoints Rohingya by failing to condemn persecution
[1] As the crowds trickled out of the
Yangon sports ground where Pope Francis
delivered his first public mass before tens of
thousands of people, Khin Maung Myint, a
[5] Rohingya activist, sat on the sidelines. He
was disappointed. Not in Francis, but in the
advisers who appear to have dissuaded the
pontiff from bringing up the plight of the
Rohingya people. “Rohingya are not the
[10] ones who lost their dignity, but the people
who silence the pope’s expression,” he said.
“Those who pushed the pope not to use the
word Rohingya, they are the ones who lost
their dignity.”
[15] Francis is nearing the end of a
four-day visit to Myanmar, previously
known as Burma, in which he has not
publicly spoken about the persecuted
Muslim minority, more than 620,000 of
[20] whom have fled to Bangladesh in recent
months, escaping what western leaders are
calling ethnic cleansing.
Among the guests in the VIP
section, where a gazebo provided protection
[25] from the hot Myanmar sun, was Aye Ne
Win, the grandson of the country’s first
dictator who attracted public derision
recently after he dressed up as the pope for
Halloween. Beside him, in a black veil, sat a
[30] beauty queen who has described the
Rohingya in a YouTube video as “harbingers
of terror and violence”.
In his homily on Wednesday, the
pope talked about the need for forgiveness
[35] and ignoring the desire for revenge, but
declined to reference violence meted out
against the Rohingya, a campaign allegedly
marked by gang-rape, massacres and
arson. “We think that healing can come
[40] from anger or revenge,” Francis said,
speaking of the many “wounded” people in
Myanmar. “Yet the way of revenge is not
the way of Jesus,” he said. It was his
second public address in Myanmar, coming
[45] after he shared a stage with the state
counsellor, Aung San Suu Kyi, on Tuesday,
telling an audience of diplomats and
journalists that all of Myanmar’s religious
and minority ethnic groups – “none
[50] excluded” – should be respected.
Both speeches have fallen short of
what many expected from the pope, whose
advocacy for refugees has been a
benchmark of his papacy. He has previously
[55] referred to “our Rohingya brothers and
sisters”. At a press conference in Yangon on
Wednesday night, papal spokesman Greg
Burke said the moral authority of the Pope
“still stands”. “You can criticize what is said
[60] or not said but the Pope is not going to lose
any moral authority on this question here,”
he said.
The Rohingya have suffered
decades of persecution in Myanmar, where
[65] their freedoms have been slowly eroded and
tens of thousands are confined to
internment camps. They are widely deemed
illegal immigrants from Bangladesh and
labelled “Bengalis”. “For years the
[70] international community has towed the
government of Myanmar’s line, refusing to
say ‘Rohingya’ for fear of doing harm,” said
David Baulk, a Myanmar researcher for
Fortify Rights. “There should be nothing
[75] controversial about the pope identifying
people by the name they want.”
Whether or not the pope should
address the crisis has been a matter of
debate within the Vatican since the visit was
[80] announced, according to a source familiar
with discussions. “There are probably a mix
of voices in the Vatican,” they said. “Those
who are old school diplomats for whom
caution is always their watchword and
[85] others who are a bit more bold.”
The most vocal was until recently
Charles Maung Bo, Myanmar’s first cardinal,
a powerful orator who has fiercely defended
the Rohingya and condemned “merchants of
[90] hatred” in the form of Buddhist
ultranationalists who have sanctioned the
violence.
Before this week’s visit he urged
the pope not to use the word, though he
[95] has made it clear he would have been
happy with a compromise phrase, according
to the source. “I think one factor in this was
almost certainly pressure from within the
church on him because he has been so
[100] outspoken until now and I think there would
have been an enormous amount of pressure
from other bishops,” the source said.
Who are the Rohingya?
At the press conference on
[105] Wednesday night, the split between the
bishops was apparent, with one saying
there was a lack of “reliable evidence” of
atrocities and was not sure what was going
on because he had not seen it himself.
[110] The silence is likely to appease
many Catholics in the country who either
share prejudices against the Rohingya or
are afraid of a nationalist backlash against
the 650,000-strong Catholic community in
[115] Myanmar.
Francis is scheduled to fly to
Dhaka in Bangladesh where he will meet
Rohingya refugees on Thursday. But for
some in Myanmar, the leader of the church
[120] has a moral obligation not to leave the
country without commenting on its most
pressing crisis.
After the mass, Father Thomas, a
Yangon priest, said he hoped the pope
[125] brought the matter up in closed-door
meetings this week with the army chief, Min
Aung Hlaing, and Aung San Suu Kyi.
“This is the main issue in Burma,”
he said.
www.theguardian.com/nov.27.2017
The tenses of the underlined verbs in “...he has not publicly spoken about the persecuted Muslim minority...” (lines 17-19), “...who attracted public derision...” (line 27), and “...where he will meet Rohingya refugees..” (lines 117-118) are respectively
Faça seu login GRÁTIS
Minhas Estatísticas Completas
Estude o conteúdo com a Duda